State Monopoly of the Right to Punish and Private Security Companies

Today, political philosophers see the social contract as a symbol ofpopular satisfaction and basis of legitimacy democraticgovernment. In philosophy, it is believed that by entering into socialcontract, individuals are deprived right to punish offenders consentto government prosecute perpetrators on behalf them. However, thequestion whether this an exclusive state, or if personswho party transfer another person, realor legal, person also has punish. regard, two majorviews "instrumental nature state" "the inherent thestate" have been raised in practice punishment. According firstpoint, while people given punishment imposed bythe government, determine enforce thesentence, " supposed carry out justice state betterthan any other person. second view, however, role inpunitive acts, acts outside although not punishable.The present paper addresses issue monopoly thegovernment, what limits concludes theright belongs State, but may authorize certain powers tothe privat security companies execute its behalf.